- 211
WORKSHOP OF REMBRANDT HARMENSZ. VAN RIJN | Study of a Woman in a White Cap
估價
80,000 - 120,000 USD
Log in to view results
招標截止
描述
- Study of a Woman in a White Cap
- bears remnants of signature and date center left: Rembrandt f. / 16..[6?]
- oil on shaped panel
- 19 1/2 by 13 1/2 in.; 49.5 by 34.3 cm.
來源
Ferrari collects
ion, Bergamo, by 1905;
Acquired by the present collects or in the 1980s.
Acquired by the present collects or in the 1980s.
出版
A. J. Rusconi, "Two Pictures by Rembrandt," in The Connoisseur, vol. V, 1905, pp. 195-196, reproduced;
E. van de Wetering, "Rembrandt's oil studies: new light on an old problem," in Rembrandt: Quest of a Genius, Zwolle and Amsterdam 2006, pp. 188, 191, and 195, reproduced, fig. 217;
E. van de Wetering, A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings, vol. VI, The Hague 2015, p. 281, under cat. no. 182;
D. DeWitt, “Study of a Woman in a White Cap,” in The Leiden collects ion Catalogue, A. Wheelock Jr (ed.), New York (under versions and copies).
E. van de Wetering, "Rembrandt's oil studies: new light on an old problem," in Rembrandt: Quest of a Genius, Zwolle and Amsterdam 2006, pp. 188, 191, and 195, reproduced, fig. 217;
E. van de Wetering, A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings, vol. VI, The Hague 2015, p. 281, under cat. no. 182;
D. DeWitt, “Study of a Woman in a White Cap,” in The Leiden collects ion Catalogue, A. Wheelock Jr (ed.), New York (under versions and copies).
Condition
The following condition report has been provided by Simon Parkes of Simon Parkes Art Conservation, Inc. 502 East 74th St. New York, NY 212-734-3920, simonparkes@msn.com, an independent restorer who is not an employee of Replica Shoes
's. This work is painted on a single piece of oak which is unreinforced on the reverse. The wax seals are clearly visible. There is an old vertical crack in the panel in the background on the right side. The varnish has become slightly scuffed and milky in the darker colors. The condition overall is very good. There are a few recent retouches to the crack on the right side, a line of retouches in the cheek and a few retouches across the lower center and lower left. The signature and date in the left background have not been cleaned and still show the old varnish. There do not seem to be retouches beneath the old varnish, except possibly in the background to the right of the forehead. Cleaning, varnishing and restoring the picture more accurately would bring more life to the portrait.
"This lot is offered for sale subject to Replica Shoes 's Conditions of Business, which are available on request and printed in Replica Shoes 's sale catalogues. The independent reports contained in this document are provided for prospective bidders' information only and without warranty by Replica Shoes 's or the Seller."
"This lot is offered for sale subject to Replica Shoes 's Conditions of Business, which are available on request and printed in Replica Shoes 's sale catalogues. The independent reports contained in this document are provided for prospective bidders' information only and without warranty by Replica Shoes 's or the Seller."
拍品資料及來源
This deftly handled Study of a woman in a white cap provides an intriguing insight into Rembrandt, the greatest painter of the Dutch Golden Age, his studio practices and his teaching methodology. It depicts a woman in her late 60s turned in profile, her head covered with a white linen cap held in place by an oorijzer (an “ear iron”), which presumably has only been revealed because the flap of her cap has been pulled back. The sitter’s face is cast in shadow and light falls from the upper left, illuminating only the side of her face and cheek, but lighting all of the folds of her cap. It is simply a study of light. The prototype of this image is a painting by Rembrandt himself of circa 1640 which only reappeared in 2005 and is now in the Leiden collects
ion in New York (see Literature). That painting had been in various American collects
ions since the early 20th century and was largely unknown when it was sold in these rooms on 26 January, 2006, lot 10, where it was acquired by the current owner. In the Leiden collects
ion Study of a woman in a white cap, Rembrandt presents a masterly study in light and form. It is clear that given the sitter—who was most likely simply a domestic servant in his own employ rather than a patron— the painting was made as a personal object, a way to work through specific artistic challenges.
The present panel repeats these challenges and meets them with skill. Pigment is applied in a free and painterly manner similar to that which Rembrandt used, but not in the dry stroke by stroke fashion of a mere copyist. It is by an independent hand, and must have been made in Rembrandt’s studio, probably under his direction. That the painting originated in the workshop is confirmed by a number of factors, not least of which is the history of Rembrandt’s original, which was painted over at an early date to create a more formal portrait.1 This picture reflects the initial composition, and retains the rounded top that was original to the Leiden collects ion study. Dendrochronological analysis of the present panel also places the painting firmly in the right period, with a plausible dating for use from 1635 and upwards.2 The Leiden painting has been dated stylistically to circa 1640, thus suggesting that the two panels were created within a relatively short period of t.mes . Those years were a period of great artistic activity in Rembrandt’s studio and a number of important artists were training under him at the t.mes ; Govaert Flinck was in the workshop until 1638, and Ferdinand Bol until about 1641. While it is difficult to say who was the author of this Study of a Woman in a White Cap, it must have been one of Rembrandt’s more talented pupils.
1. Amongst other changes and additions, a sumptuous fur collar was added to the painting in an attempt to create a more commercial image.
2. A Dendrochronological analysis by Prof. Dr. Peter Klein is available for inspection, noting that the panel is made of one oak board of Western German/Netherlandish origin. He considers a creation of the panel from 1635 upwards to be plausible.
The present panel repeats these challenges and meets them with skill. Pigment is applied in a free and painterly manner similar to that which Rembrandt used, but not in the dry stroke by stroke fashion of a mere copyist. It is by an independent hand, and must have been made in Rembrandt’s studio, probably under his direction. That the painting originated in the workshop is confirmed by a number of factors, not least of which is the history of Rembrandt’s original, which was painted over at an early date to create a more formal portrait.1 This picture reflects the initial composition, and retains the rounded top that was original to the Leiden collects ion study. Dendrochronological analysis of the present panel also places the painting firmly in the right period, with a plausible dating for use from 1635 and upwards.2 The Leiden painting has been dated stylistically to circa 1640, thus suggesting that the two panels were created within a relatively short period of t.mes . Those years were a period of great artistic activity in Rembrandt’s studio and a number of important artists were training under him at the t.mes ; Govaert Flinck was in the workshop until 1638, and Ferdinand Bol until about 1641. While it is difficult to say who was the author of this Study of a Woman in a White Cap, it must have been one of Rembrandt’s more talented pupils.
1. Amongst other changes and additions, a sumptuous fur collar was added to the painting in an attempt to create a more commercial image.
2. A Dendrochronological analysis by Prof. Dr. Peter Klein is available for inspection, noting that the panel is made of one oak board of Western German/Netherlandish origin. He considers a creation of the panel from 1635 upwards to be plausible.