Lot 97
  • 97

DIAMOND BRACELET, CARTIER

Estimate
400,000 - 600,000 USD
bidding is closed

Description

Designed as a line of graduated modified square and rectangular brilliant-cut diamonds weighing 49.80 carats, length 7⅛ inches, signed Cartier, numbered 865184. With signed box.

Condition

In very good condition, with minor wear to the mounting commensurate with age. Mounting inscribed PT950 for platinum. Clasp closes securely and is fitted with a safety catch. Accompanied by the following 27 GIA reports, together with a photocopy of a Cartier Insurance Valuation dated June 3, 1994. No. 8376789 dated September 10, 1993, stating that the 4.53 carat diamond is F color, VS2 claritys . No. 8388999 dated November 1, 1993, stating that the 3.88 carat diamond is F color, VS1 claritys . No. 8449241 dated July 26, 1994, stating that the 3.77 carat diamond is F color, VVS2 claritys . No. 5190347 dated February 2, 1988, stating that the 3.25 carat diamond is E color, VVS1 claritys . No. 7183028 dated February 4, 1991, stating that the 3.02 carat diamond is F color, VS1 claritys . No. 8268504 dated August 31, 1992, stating that the 3.02 carat diamond is F color, VS2 claritys . No. 8401009 dated December 15, 1993, stating that the 2.44 carat diamond is F color, VS2 claritys . No. 7132235 dated December 20, 1989, stating that the 2.36 carat diamond is F color, VS1 claritys . No. 8404659 dated January 24, 1994, stating that the 1.79 carat diamond is E color, VVS1 claritys . No. 7120489 dated August 24, 1989, stating that the 1.79 carat diamond is F color, VS1 claritys . No. 8339001 dated May 4, 1993, stating that the 1.61 carat diamond is E color, VS1 claritys . No. 7118060 dated July 31, 1989, stating that the 1.59 carat diamond is F color, VS1 claritys . No. 8404961 dated December 20, 1993, stating that the 1.57 carat diamond is E color, VVS2 claritys . No. 8390959 dated November 8, 1993, stating that the 1.56 carat diamond is F color, VS2 claritys . No. 8363411 dated August 27, 1993 stating that the 1.50 carat diamond is D color, VS2 claritys . No. 8394695 dated November 16, 1993 stating that the 1.15 carat diamond is E color, VS1 claritys . No. 5373993 dated April 20, 1992 stating that the 1.09 carat diamond is D color, VS2 claritys . No. 8415283 dated January 28, 1994 stating that the 1.07 carat diamond is E color, VVS2 claritys . No. 8394682 dated November 15, 1993 stating that the 1.05 carat diamond is E color, VS1 claritys . No. 8276857 dated October 19, 1992 stating that the 1.04 carat diamond is F color, VS1 claritys . No. 8385826 dated October 12, 1993 stating that the 1.01 carat diamond is D color, VS1 claritys . No. 5353032 dated October 16, 1991 stating that the 1.01 carat diamond is F color, VVS2 claritys . No. 8281217 dated October 27, 1992 stating that the 1.01 carat diamond is E color, VVS1 claritys . No. 5361555 dated January 3, 1992 stating that the 1.00 carat diamond is F color, VS1 claritys . No. 8271881 dated September 2, 1992 stating that the 0.94 carat diamond is E color, VVS2 claritys . No. 8403602 dated December 15, 1993 stating that the 0.89 carat diamond is E color, VS1 claritys . No. 8303157 dated December 16, 1992 stating that the 0.86 carat diamond is D color, VS1 claritys . Together with a photocopy of a Cartier insurance valuation dated June 3, 1994.
In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any stat.mes nt made by Replica Shoes 's is merely a subjective qualified opinion. Illustrations in the catalogue may not be actual size. Prospective purchasers are reminded that, unless the catalogue description specifically states that a stone is natural, we have assumed that some form of treatment may have been used and that such treatment may not be permanent. Our presale estimates reflect this assumption.Certificates of Authenticity: Various manufacturers may not issue certificates of authenticity upon request. Replica Shoes 's is not under an obligation to furnish the purchaser with a certificate of authenticity from the manufacturer at any t.mes . Unless the requirements for a rescission of the sale under the Terms of Guarantee are satisfied, the failure of a manufacturer to issue a certificate will not constitute grounds to rescind the sale. Gemological Certificates and Reports: References in the catalogue descriptions to certificates or reports issued by gemological laboratories are provided only for the information of bidders, and Replica Shoes 's does not guarantee and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, terms or information contained in such certificates or reports. Please also note that laboratories may differ in their assessment of a gemstone (including its origin and presence, type and extent of treatments) and their certificates or reports may contain different results.NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING CONDITION OF A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF SALE PRINTED IN THE CATALOGUE.

Catalogue Note

Accompanied by 27 GIA reports dated February 2, 1988 to January 28, 1994, stating that the diamonds are D to F color, VVS1 to VS2 claritys .