- 68
Théodore Géricault
Description
- Théodore Géricault
- Épisode de la guerre des Titans
- oil on canvas
- 15 by 18 1/4 in.
- 38 by 46.5 cm
Provenance
Private collects ion (and sold, Palais Galiera, Paris, December 5, 1964, lot 18, illustrated)
Private collects ion (acquired from the above)
Literature
Charles Clément, Géricault, étude biographique et critique avec le catalogue raisonné de l'oeuvre du maître, Paris, 1879, p. 299, no. 94
George Oprescu, Géricault, Paris, 1927, p. 80
Lorenz Eitner, "Two Rediscovered Landscapes by Géricault and the Chronology of His Early Work," Art Bulletin, vol. XXXVI, June 1954, p. 138, note 31
Jacques Thuiller and Philippe Grunchec, Tout l'oeuvre peint de Géricault, Paris, 1978, pp. 136-7, no. A 86, illustrated p. 138Lorenz Eitner, "The Literature of Art: Tout l'oeuvre peint de Géricault by J. Thuiller and P. Grunchec," Burlington Magazine, vol. CXXII, no. 924, March 1980, p. 209
Germain Bazin, Théodore Géricault: étude critique, documents et catalogue raisonné, Paris, 1987, vol. II, no. 476, pp. 316, 486-8, illustrated
Jacques Thuiller and Philippe Grunchec, Tout l'oeuvre peint de Géricault (revised edition), Paris, 1991, pp. 136-8, no. A 86, illustrated
Condition
"This lot is offered for sale subject to Replica Shoes 's Conditions of Business, which are available on request and printed in Replica Shoes 's sale catalogues. The independent reports contained in this document are provided for prospective bidders' information only and without warranty by Replica Shoes 's or the Seller."
Catalogue Note
Upon recent examination, Philippe Grunchec maintains the assertion he expressed in 1978, questioning the attribution of this work to Géricault. Lorenz Eitner disputes his position and, in Burlington Magazine in 1984, writes that " [Épisode de la] Guerre des Titans (Clément, no. 94) [is] virtually the only extant painting of a classical subject that can be attributed to Géricault. M. Grunchec supposes that Clément, who owned this study, erroneously attributed it to Géricault because it reminded him of thematically similar drawings to which, M. Grunchec finds, the picture is not actually related. But this is not so. Clément makes no mention of drawings, but quite rightly stresses the picture's high quality as a 'pochade d'une grande invention et d'un ton superbe'."
Germain Bazin dates the work to 1816-1818, the artist’s formative period, based on the loose modelling and undefineds musculature of this otherwise powerful subject.