“I am rather like Dr. Frankenstein, constructing paintings out of the residue or dead parts of other artist’s work.”
The artist quoted in: Exh. Cat., London, Serpentine Gallery, Glenn Brown, 2004, p. 95

Vincent van Gogh, Margueritte Clémentine Elisa Gachet, 1869. Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam

Executed in 2011, Glenn Brown’s monumental A Sailors Life demonstrates the masterful blend of painterly illusion and historical appropriation that has defined the artist’s practice since the 1990s. Titled after a wistful sea shanty telling the tragic tale of a widow who has lost her love at sea, the painting namechecks the fable of a woman sailing every corner of the ocean trying to decipher the whereabouts of her husband. The present work simultaneously echoes the formal invention of Vincent van Gogh’s Marguerite Gachet at the Piano from 1890, in which Van Gogh’s protagonist is depicted wearing a long white dress, with a green stool peeking out from beneath its soft cascade, as her fingers dance across a piano lit by candlelight. Marguerite was the daughter of the French physician Paul Gachet, who famously treated Van Gogh during the final weeks of his life. Rendered in luscious and dazzling candy coloured pastel hues espousing chromatic vibrancy and compositional dynamism, here, Brown’s subject is recognisable yet distorted. Rather than simply appropriating Van Gogh's familiar image, Brown transposes it, transforming the work through careful manipulation and rotation. Marguerite is turned upside down, her head is cropped and the background removed as figurative contours begin to expand and contract. The inversion of top and bottom, an idea adopted from Georg Baselitz, provides Brown with the means to shift the viewer’s attention away from the subject and onto the technique of the painting's execution. In Brown’s rendition, he meticulously flattens Van Gogh's bold strokes until the texture is entirely absent, leaving a surface curiously devoid of impasto yet rich with meaning. As Marguerite subsequently slides into a sea of abstraction, Brown adds an anomalous black dot which serves to flatten the picture plane and disorient the viewer. In the ensuing fray, Brown’s emancipated pianist floats, hauntingly adrift. Befitting its importance, this work was included in Brown’s major retrospective held at the Contemporary Arts Center, Ohio and Des Moines Art Center, Iowa, in 2016.

The present work installed in Glenn Brown, Des Moines Art Center, 2017. Art © 2024 GLENN BROWN

Each of Brown’s works begin as a sketch, a foundational gesture in which he establishes the parameters of size, colour, and form. Uploaded and manipulated on Photoshop, the image undergoes a metamorphosis of distortion and inversion. Colours are altered, formations cropped and stretched – the work is made to bend to Brown’s will. The resultant image is projected or otherwise transferred onto the surface to be painted, to provide a framework that limits what can happen next, beyond a faithful transference of colour and form. In Brown’s eyes, “the departure from the ‘original’ occurs the moment I have the notion to paint the painting and only stops when it is finished” (the artist quoted in: Exh. Cat. Tate Liverpool, Glenn Brown, 2009, p. 140). Indeed, the liberties that Brown takes with his source material do not cease when he picks up his brush. Although he meticulously renders the brushstrokes visible in his manipulated base image, he also “inserts impasto brush marks where none had previously existed
 [adds] bright highlights
 [and] thin glazes of translucent, tinted varnishes to include a feeling of depth” (Michael Stubbs, ‘Glenn Brown: No Visible Means of Support’, in: ibid., p.103). This embrace of mediation extends into the digital realm, in which, through digital intervention, Brown delights in this trompe l’oeil transformation, where the texture of oil paint is flattened into smooth, hyperreal veneers and rendered eerily pristine.

"The departure from the ‘original’ occurs the moment I have the notion to paint the painting and only stops when it is finished.”
The artist quoted in: Exh. Cat. Tate Liverpool, Glenn Brown, 2009, p. 140.

Georg Baselitz, The Gleaner, 1978. Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Image: Art Resource, NY/Scala, Florence. Art © 2024 Georg Baselitz

Brown’s appropriations have expanded to encompass a vast array of artists from a far reaching array of movements. His imagery spans from the Old Masters to the pioneers of Impressionism, Expressionism, and Surrealism, deftly interweaving these visual sources into his own fractured compositions. A student of Michael Craig-Martin at Goldsmiths, and a contemporary of Damien Hirst, Chris Ofili and Peter Doig, Brown came to prominence amid the rise of the YBA generation. It was during this period of artistic upheaval that Brown carved his distinctive niche, drawing inspiration from a myriad of influences, most notably the photorealism of Gerhard Richter. Richter’s meticulous technique left an indelible mark on Brown, whose own works echo this precision while venturing into the conceptual realms of appropriation. Brown was also heavily influenced by the Pictures Generation, including Richard Prince, Cindy Sherman, and Sherrie Levine, whose re-contextualisation of imagery informed his explorations of visual reproduction. Brown’s creative output is therefore a tribute not only to the power of art history but also to its inherent fluidity – a dynamic dialogue between the past His ability to evoke complex emotions while dismantling traditional notions of texture, form, and originality positions him as a pivotal figure in the evolution of contemporary visual expression.