âI am rather like Dr. Frankenstein, constructing paintings out of the residue or dead parts of other artistâs work.â
Executed in 2011, Glenn Brownâs monumental A Sailors Life demonstrates the masterful blend of painterly illusion and historical appropriation that has defined the artistâs practice since the 1990s. Titled after a wistful sea shanty telling the tragic tale of a widow who has lost her love at sea, the painting namechecks the fable of a woman sailing every corner of the ocean trying to decipher the whereabouts of her husband. The present work simultaneously echoes the formal invention of Vincent van Goghâs Marguerite Gachet at the Piano from 1890, in which Van Goghâs protagonist is depicted wearing a long white dress, with a green stool peeking out from beneath its soft cascade, as her fingers dance across a piano lit by candlelight. Marguerite was the daughter of the French physician Paul Gachet, who famously treated Van Gogh during the final weeks of his life. Rendered in luscious and dazzling candy coloured pastel hues espousing chromatic vibrancy and compositional dynamism, here, Brownâs subject is recognisable yet distorted. Rather than simply appropriating Van Gogh's familiar image, Brown transposes it, transforming the work through careful manipulation and rotation. Marguerite is turned upside down, her head is cropped and the background removed as figurative contours begin to expand and contract. The inversion of top and bottom, an idea adopted from Georg Baselitz, provides Brown with the means to shift the viewerâs attention away from the subject and onto the technique of the painting's execution. In Brownâs rendition, he meticulously flattens Van Gogh's bold strokes until the texture is entirely absent, leaving a surface curiously devoid of impasto yet rich with meaning. As Marguerite subsequently slides into a sea of abstraction, Brown adds an anomalous black dot which serves to flatten the picture plane and disorient the viewer. In the ensuing fray, Brownâs emancipated pianist floats, hauntingly adrift. Befitting its importance, this work was included in Brownâs major retrospective held at the Contemporary Arts Center, Ohio and Des Moines Art Center, Iowa, in 2016.
Each of Brownâs works begin as a sketch, a foundational gesture in which he establishes the parameters of size, colour, and form. Uploaded and manipulated on Photoshop, the image undergoes a metamorphosis of distortion and inversion. Colours are altered, formations cropped and stretched â the work is made to bend to Brownâs will. The resultant image is projected or otherwise transferred onto the surface to be painted, to provide a framework that limits what can happen next, beyond a faithful transference of colour and form. In Brownâs eyes, âthe departure from the âoriginalâ occurs the moment I have the notion to paint the painting and only stops when it is finishedâ (the artist quoted in: Exh. Cat. Tate Liverpool, Glenn Brown, 2009, p. 140). Indeed, the liberties that Brown takes with his source material do not cease when he picks up his brush. Although he meticulously renders the brushstrokes visible in his manipulated base image, he also âinserts impasto brush marks where none had previously existed⊠[adds] bright highlights⊠[and] thin glazes of translucent, tinted varnishes to include a feeling of depthâ (Michael Stubbs, âGlenn Brown: No Visible Means of Supportâ, in: ibid., p.103). This embrace of mediation extends into the digital realm, in which, through digital intervention, Brown delights in this trompe lâoeil transformation, where the texture of oil paint is flattened into smooth, hyperreal veneers and rendered eerily pristine.
"The departure from the âoriginalâ occurs the moment I have the notion to paint the painting and only stops when it is finished.â
Brownâs appropriations have expanded to encompass a vast array of artists from a far reaching array of movements. His imagery spans from the Old Masters to the pioneers of Impressionism, Expressionism, and Surrealism, deftly interweaving these visual sources into his own fractured compositions. A student of Michael Craig-Martin at Goldsmiths, and a contemporary of Damien Hirst, Chris Ofili and Peter Doig, Brown came to prominence amid the rise of the YBA generation. It was during this period of artistic upheaval that Brown carved his distinctive niche, drawing inspiration from a myriad of influences, most notably the photorealism of Gerhard Richter. Richterâs meticulous technique left an indelible mark on Brown, whose own works echo this precision while venturing into the conceptual realms of appropriation. Brown was also heavily influenced by the Pictures Generation, including Richard Prince, Cindy Sherman, and Sherrie Levine, whose re-contextualisation of imagery informed his explorations of visual reproduction. Brownâs creative output is therefore a tribute not only to the power of art history but also to its inherent fluidity â a dynamic dialogue between the past His ability to evoke complex emotions while dismantling traditional notions of texture, form, and originality positions him as a pivotal figure in the evolution of contemporary visual expression.
Interview with Glenn Brown | The Shape of Things: Still Life in Britain