“The superb painting is filled with expressions as varied as they are true: the drawing is fine and precise, and the brushwork is of the utmost delicacy; the harmony and tone are of perfect beauty; indeed, we know of nothing more important or better by this great painter.”[1]
T his panoramic masterpiece by David Teniers the Younger captures the vibrant life of seventeenth-century Flanders, offering a richly detailed and animated depiction of the annual Potter’s Fair held in Ghent on the Feast of the Madeleine. Teeming with human activity, the scene presents an image of community and commerce. Although undated, the panel, the only known view of Ghent in Teniers’ oeuvre, was likely executed in the late 1640s, during his most acclaimed and productive years. Appointed Dean of the Antwerp painter’s guild in 1645 or 1646, Teniers was summoned to Brussels in 1651 by Archduke Leopold William, who named him court painter.
Bathed in a soft, golden light, the composition focuses on Ghent’s bustling square, crowded with townspeople and merchants, vendors and cust.mes rs, and observers of all ages. Small stands and tented stalls display earthenware plates, bowls, and jugs as well as more expensive Delftware and Chinese kraak porcelain. On offer are delicacies, such as salted herring and cured fish that root the scene in regional tradition, as well as tobacco, imported from the Americas. Social interactions abound: from inspecting pottery and haggling, to eating, drinking, and making merry. Such civic fairs were not only commercial events, but also hubs of information exchange and occasions for popular entertainment, underscoring their social and political importance.
A rich narrative unfolds across the scene, reflecting what the catalogue of François-Antoine Robit’s sale praised as “the fecundity of the artist’s genius.”2 At left an innkeeper in red raises a tankard, advertising beer as a way of attracting guests. Closer to the center, a boy asks two men with walking sticks for alms, while his companion discretely picks their pockets. To their left, in the center foreground, stand a finely dressed trio, who in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries were identified as Teniers, his wife Anna Brueghel in a blue silk dress, and his pupil Thomas van Apshoven.3 Just behind, a performance takes place on a makeshift stage where an actor wearing a feathered hat entertains the rapt crowd. Beyond, people stroll along the riverbank. Though subtle signs of excess appear—such as the drunkard at right who lies beside a pig—Teniers seems less concerned with moral critique than with conveying the crowd’s spirited mood and the fair’s conviviality.
Several architectural structures dominate the skyline. At left rise the city’s red brick guild halls. At center stands the now-destroyed parish church of Notre Dame, a thirteenth-century Gothic structure demolished in 1799, whose soaring spire serves as a visual anchor. Nearby is the collegiate church of Saint Peter. Originally Romanesque, the church was plundered during the 1566 Iconoclast riots and destroyed soon thereafter. In 1629, Antonius Triest, the Archbishop of Ghent, laid the foundation stone for the new Baroque structure, completed only in 1722 following a halt in construction in 1649, which serves as a terminus ante quem for the painting’s execution. This precise dating, coupled with the work’s topographical precision, led Holger Simon to propose that Triest himself, who likely facilitated Teniers’ introduction to Leopold William, may have commissioned the panel.4
A Note on Provenance
Teniers’ Potters’ Fair at Ghent boasts a distinguished provenance that attests both to the painting’s artistic excellence and its enduring appeal. The work is first definitively recorded in the collects ion of Jacques Meyers, described by Koenraad Jonckheere as “probably the most important private collects or ever in the Netherlands.”5 A Rotterdam merchant, ship-owner, and somet.mes art dealer, Meyers assembled a superb collects ion that included, among other masterpieces, Nicolas Poussin’s Seven Sacraments.6 At.mes yers’ posthumous sale, the catalogue described the work as “exceptionally beautiful and the best that can be found, in which everything is so vividly depicted…that except for the sound and movement, one would easily believe oneself to be present [in the scene].”7 The painting sold for 576 guilders, a remarkable price at the t.mes .8
In 1785, the Flemish dealer John Bertels brought the work to France, where it soon entered the collects ion of the Parisian jeweler Jean Dubois. The Teniers was the most expensive work in his subsequent sale, where it was acquired by the pastellist and art dealer Thomas-François Guérin. It was likely during this period, when Teniers’ genre scenes enjoyed particular popularity in France, that the composition was copied on at least two occasions.9
By the early nineteenth century, the painting had entered the collects ion of Charles Ferdinand of Bourbon. Upon his assassination at the Paris Opèra by a Bonapartist, the work was inherited by his widow, Marie-Caroline of Bourbon, duchesse de Barry. The catalogue for her 1837 sale lavishly praised the work: “One need only contemplate this rare and important painting, as sublime in its familiar style as Raphael's Transfiguration in its noble style...No one has better captured the form of the peasants of Flanders than he [Teniers].”10
By 1842, Charles Heusch had acquired the picture. His entire collects ion of choice Flemish and Dutch paintings, was subsequently purchased en bloc by Lionel Nathan de Rothschild. Potters’ Fair at Ghent remained in distinguished Rothschild family collects ion until it was sold, likely through the eminent Finnish art historian Tancred Borenius, to the noted English collects or and mail-order magnate John Enrico Fattorini. Almost half a century later, his descendants sold the work at Replica Shoes ’s, London, in July 1996. Four years later, it entered the collects ion of Lester L. Weindling, in whose possession it remained for the past quarter century.
1 “Ce superbe tableau est rempli d'expression aussi variée que vraie: le dessin en est fin et correct, et la touche de la plus grande finesse; l'harmonie et le ton en font d'une beauté parfaite; enfin nous ne connaissons rien de plus capital ni de meilleur de ce grand Peintre.” Paris, Paillet, Lebrun, and Julliot, 20 December 1785, lot 13, where the work went unsold.
2 “briller la fécondité de son génie.” Paris, Paillet and Delaroche, 11 May 1801, lot 147.
3 Likely apocryphal, especially when compared with known likenesses, such as The Painter with His Family in the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin (inv. no. 857).
4 Simon 1996, pp. 196-198.
5 Jonckheere 2008, p. 84. See also K. Jonckheere, “Port de transit, La collects ion de Jacques Meyers à Rotterdam et le grand commerce international d’oeuvres d’art entre Paris, Rotterdam et les États allemands autour de 1700,” in Art français et art allemand au xviiie siècle, Regards croisés, P. Michel (ed.), Paris 2008, pp. 283-310.
6 On loan to the National Galleries of Scotland, Edinburgh, by the Duke of Sutherland.
7 “Een Gentsche Kermis dewelke jaerlyks by de Abdy van St Pieter wort gehouden: door David Teniers, zynde dit stuk altoos geacht voor ongemeen schoon en 't beste dat van hem te vinden is, waerin alles, door eene groote menigte Volks van allerlei zoort en rang zoo levendig is verbeeld, dat.mes n, buiten 't geluid en de beweging, dikwils zou gelooven daer tegenwoordig te zyn.” Rotterdam, 9 September 1722, lot 178.
8 Only seven works achieved higher prices, all of which today reside in important museum collects ions, including the Norton Simon Museum, Pasadena (Nicolas Poussin, Camillus and the Schoolmaster of Falerii, inv. no. F.1970.14.P), the Detroit Institute of Art (Sir Peter Paul Rubens, The Meeting of David and Abigail, inv. no. 89.63) and Hampton Court Palace (Luca Giordano, Cupid and Psyche, inv. nos. RCIN 402959-402964, 406769-406774).
9 One version is in the Theaterwissenschaftliche Sammlung, University of Köln, Schloss Wahn, and another is recorded in the Rijksbureau, The Hague.
10 “Il faut seulement contempler assez long-temps ce rare et capital tableau, aussi sublime dans le genre familier que la transfiguration de Raphael dans le style noble, pour reconnaitre que personne n'a mieux rendu que lui la forme des paysans de la Flandre…” Paris, Paillet, 5 April 1837, lot 7.