The present work pictured with Roy Lichtenstein in his 190 Bowery studio, 1967. Photo by Judy B. Ross, courtesy RLF Archives. Art © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein
"Today, finally, even the hegemony of “culture” is dissolving... and we’re back to the issue of what’s good and what’s bad, regardless. This leaves paintings like Lichtenstein’s Modern Paintings alive in the eternal present as singular confrontational objects...They don’t give themselves up or let you go.”
Dave Hickey quoted in: Exh. Cat., New York, Richard Gray Gallery, Roy Lichtenstein: Modern Paintings, 2010, p. 13

Roy Lichtenstein’s unmistakable graphic vocabulary crystallizes into scarlet, yellow, and ultramarine geometry, arching and interlocking into an urban panorama: Modern Painting Triptych II. Here, the steel ornamentation and industrial ligatures—joints of sleek new feats in engineering—of Manhattan’s Art Deco skyline are synthesized and recast in broad passages of primary-colored Ben-Day dots. Modern Painting Triptych II is one of 48 paintings which constitute the Modern Paintings series; of the just six multipanel works, including the present work, half belong in prestigious institutional collects ions: the Norton Simon Museum, Pasadena; Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Washington, D.C.; and Ryobi Foundation, Carbondale. Lichtenstein’s discoveries in the Modern Paintings would prove so formative that they would form the basis of his next body of work: the repetition of forms in Modern Painting Triptych II anticipates the series of Modular Paintings to follow, whose duplicating compositional grids developed upon these same themes of mechanization and seriality in the industry age. Further test.mes nt to its significance in Lichtenstein’s oeuvre, Modern Painting Triptych II bears an extraordinary exhibition history, from its 1967 debut in Lichtenstein’s solo presentation at the legendary Leo Castelli Gallery to an extended loan at the National collects ion of Replica Handbags s, Smithsonian American Art Museum in Washington, D.C. Just as Art Deco fused Futurism, Cubism, de Stil, and ancient.mes sopotamia and Mesoamerica, taking old and new to create an architecture for present, Lichtenstein, too, proves himself to be an architect of his t.mes through his triumphant Modern Paintings.

Fernand LĂ©ger, The Discs in the City, 1921. MusĂ©e National d’Art Moderne, Paris. Image © Peter Willi / Bridgeman Images. Art © 2025 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris
View of Midtown Manhattan with the Chrysler Building, mid-20th century. Image © Frederic Lewis / Getty Images

Lichtenstein created his first Modern Paintings in 1966, four decades after the earliest Art Deco projects began studding the Manhattan skyline. Art Deco, unveiled at the 1925 Exposition Internationale des Arts DĂ©coratifs et Industriels Modernes in Paris, was the style that gave New York City, where Lichtenstein lived and worked, its character and cadence: from the Empire State to the Chrysler, the most iconic buildings boasted a novel decorative quality and towering verticality. Yet just as the style became the face of twentieth-century modernity, Modernism outpaced it—William Van Alen and Raymond Hood were usurped by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Philip Johnson, and Louis Kahn, whose glass-encased constructions made the vanguard of just a few thirty years prior feel dated.

Left: Piet Mondrian, Broadway Boogie Woogie, 1942-43. The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Image © The Museum of Modern Art / Licensed by SCALA / Art Resource, NY. Right: Jasper Johns, Target, 1961. The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago. Image © The Art Institute of Chicago / Art Resource, NY. Art © 2025 Jasper Johns / Licensed by VAGA at Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY

With his characteristic levity, Lichtenstein now parodized the vernacular of so-called modernity, his painterly pastiches engineering a reconciliation of once-spectacular innovation with Pop ingenuity. “What is particularly unnerving about the series is what is most relevant to the subject of Modernism versus Postmodernism,” David Antin observes, “The pathos of Modern Art is particular to itself
 It was the specific claim of ‘modernism’ to be finally and forever open. That was its ‘futurism,’ and now that its future has receded into the past it can be had as a sealed package whose contents have the exotic look of something released from a t.mes capsule.” (David Antin, “Modernism and Postmodernism: Approaching the Present in American Poetry,” boundary 2, Iss. 1, 1972, p. 99) Modern Painting Triptych II thus stylizes the already stylized, retrofitting the bygone past for the future.

Modern Paintings in Museum collects ions

All Art © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein
“What is particularly unnerving about the series is what is most relevant to the subject of modernism versus postmodernism
 The pathos of Modern Art is particular to itself. There is after all nothing pathetic about Baroque or Victorian Art. But it was the specific claim of "modernism" to be finally and forever open. That was its "futurism," and now that its future has receded into the past it can be had as a sealed package whose contents have the exotic look of something released from a t.mes capsule."
DAVID ANTIN, “MODERNISM AND POSTMODERNISM: APPROACHING THE PRESENT IN AMERICAN POETRY,” BOUNDARY 2, VOL. 1, 1972, P.99

Georgia O’Keefe, Ritz Tower, 1928. Image © Georgia O'Keeffe Museum, Santa Fe / Art Resource, NY. Art © 2025 George O’Keefe Museum / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York

The primary palette and geometric composition of Modern Painting Tripych II also obliquely appropriates the advents of such renowned de Stijl artists as Piet Mondrian and Theo van Doesberg. Lichtenstein wrestled at length with Mondrian’s work in particular, interrogating the dissonance between Mondrian’s utopian notions of structure and order and the political unrest that underpinned the period of their creation. Modern Painting Triptych II embodies Lichtenstein’s examination of this distinctly Modern turbulence beneath the pristine surface of the two-dimensional canvas’ visual register, and his output would only continue to invest further and further into a dialogue with the history, criticism, and methodology of art. What began as a recontextualization of kitsch, everyday iconography would evolve into an unerring investigation of his predecessors in the paintings to follow. But the Modern Paintings reveal an early and prognostic engagement with art history in real-t.mes : the quotidian imagery of consumer goods and comic book scenes of hopeful, hopeless war and romance through which he found his artistic footing would usher him toward the architectural polemics of the world around him. In this way Modern Painting Triptych II rests firmly on the bedrock of Lichtenstein’s artistic enterprise—an undiscriminating embrace of art and imagery and subverting the associations of taste bound to them.

"Lichtenstein’s new paintings and sculptures are trophies of the 30s; trophies in the sense of mementos and memorials annexed from somebody else. In this case, the other is the form-sense of a preceding period.”
Larrence Alloway quoted in: Exh. Cat., Cincinnati, Contemporary Arts Center, Roy Lichtenstein: Exhibition of Paintings and Sculpture, December 1967 - January 1968, n.p.

The present work installed at Leo Castelli Gallery, October - November 1967. Art © Estate of Roy Lichtenstein

Though the Modern Paintings sought new inspiration in metropolitan America, they stand as representations of Lichtenstein’s extant commitment to seeing the world as it is and painting it anew. Though fast dated, the Art Deco ecosystem that shaped New York would, Lichtenstein made sure, remain forever relevant. “From ash-tray to movie-theater foyer,” Lawrence Alloway notes, “the 30s are with us; as places to go, objects to use, the products of the period are a known, though [sic.] unvalued, part of our environment. They are definitely one of our common, non-esoteric fields of reference. Lichtenstein’s new paintings and sculptures are trophies of the 30s; trophies in the sense of mementos and memorials annexed from somebody else. In this case, the other is the form-sense of a preceding period.” (Lawrence Alloway quoted in: Exh. Cat., Cincinnati, Contemporary Arts Center, Roy Lichtenstein: Exhibition of Paintings and Sculpture, December 1967 - January 1968, n.p.) Thus, Modern Painting Triptych II not only encapsulates Lichtenstein’s compelling question of taste and aesthetics but challenges how artistic invention—even those close in the rearview of the avant-garde—can be traced, disrupted, and forever reinvented.